Milk-free diet followed by breastfeeding women.

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is the most common way of feeding infants. Human milk contains nutrients which are necessary to provide proper growth of a child. Nowadays there aren't any recommendations to follow elimination diet in order to decrease the risk of allergy or baby colic. Only the occurrence of health problems such as lactose intolerance or cow's milk protein allergy in breastfeeding mother or infant should be a reason for eliminating dairy products from diet. It seems to be important to explore the reasons and the frequency of following milk-free diet by breastfeeding women. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of the study was to find the reasons for following milk-free diet by breastfeeding women and making an assessment of their nutrition knowledge and food habits. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-three breastfeeding women following milk-free diet took part in the project. The women were interviewed by the Computer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) method with an original questionnaire. The results were developed with Spearman's rank correlation, Chi2 test and the gamma coefficient. The statistical significance level for the p-value was <0.05. RESULTS: The main reason for following milk-free diet by the breastfeeding women was the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions of the children's gastrointestinal system after consuming milk by mother (72% responses). After excluding milk from diet only 42% respondents declared consuming new food products or dietary supplements in order to refill the potential deficiency of nutrients. The majority of respondents also eliminated from diet highly processed food products, fast-food and the carbonated drinks. The most often declared source of information about lactation was Internet (85%). Only 12% respondents asked a nutritionist in order to get the information about breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: It's necessary to promote a specific nutritional advice about following milk-free diet in breastfeeding women group in order to decrease the health risk connected with low calcium diet.

Preterm Infants May Better Tolerate Feeds at Temperatures Closer to Freshly Expressed Breast Milk: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Feeding intolerance is one of the most frequent problems among preterm infants. These infants are fed with expressed breast milk or preterm formulas of which the temperature is not routinely measured. In this study, we aimed to examine the effects of feeds with warm milk versus room temperature milk in preterm infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infants with a birth weight ≤1,500 g or gestational age ≤34 weeks were included in the study and assigned to two different feeding temperature groups (22-24°C and 32-34°C). Some infants in both groups were exclusively breast milk-fed, and some received breast milk and artificial milk (mixed feeding). Feeding tolerance of infants in both groups and the consequences were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 80 preterm infants (group 1 fed with milk at 22-24°C, n = 40; group 2 fed with milk at 32-34°C, n = 40) were prospectively included in the study. There was a slight decrease in gastric residual frequency in infants fed with breast milk in group 2. Apnea was significantly more frequent in group 1 (p = 0.006), and these infants needed more anti-reflux treatment (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: According to our results, warming enteral feeds close to body temperature are encouraging especially due to the decrease in gastric residual frequency, apnea of prematurity, and need for anti-reflux treatment. More studies may confirm the positive effect of warm enteral feeds on feeding tolerance in preterm infants.

Lactase persistence, milk intake, hip fracture and bone mineral density: a study of 97 811 Danish individuals and a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether a causal relationship exists between milk intake and reduced risk of fractures is unclear. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that genetically determined milk intake reduces the risk of fractures and increases bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: We investigated the association between milk intake, LCT-13910 C/T (rs4988235), which is associated with lactase persistence (TT/TC) in Northern Europeans, and hip fractures in three Danish prospective studies (N = 97 811, age ≥20 years). We added meta-analyses of LCT-13910 and fractures and BMD from five published Northern European population studies. RESULTS: In the Danish studies, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for hip fracture per one glass per week higher milk intake was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.99-1.01). The per T-allele milk intake was 0.58 (0.49-0.68) glasses per week, but HR was 1.01 (0.94-1.09) for hip fracture. In meta-analyses of Danish studies with published Northern European population studies, the random effects odds ratio for any fracture was 0.86 (0.61-1.21; I2 = 73%) for TT vs. CC and 0.90 (0.68-1.21; I2 = 63%) for TC vs. CC. The standardized mean difference in femoral neck BMD was 0.10 (0.02-0.18; I2 = 0%) g cm-2 for TT vs. CC and 0.06 (-0.04 to 0.17; I2 = 17%) g cm-2 for TC vs. CC. There were no differences in lumbar spine or total hip BMD comparing TT or TC with CC. CONCLUSION: Genetically lifelong lactase persistence with high milk intake was not associated with hip fracture in Danish population-based cohorts. A meta-analysis combining Danish studies with published Northern European population studies also showed that lactase persistence was not associated with fracture risk. Genetic lactase persistence was associated with a higher femoral neck BMD, but not lumbar spine or total hip BMD.

Milk kefir: nutritional, microbiological and health benefits.

Kefir is fermented milk produced from grains that comprise a specific and complex mixture of bacteria and yeasts that live in a symbiotic association. The nutritional composition of kefir varies according to the milk composition, the microbiological composition of the grains used, the time/temperature of fermentation and storage conditions. Kefir originates from the Caucasus and Tibet. Recently, kefir has raised interest in the scientific community due to its numerous beneficial effects on health. Currently, several scientific studies have supported the health benefits of kefir, as reported historically as a probiotic drink with great potential in health promotion, as well as being a safe and inexpensive food, easily produced at home. Regular consumption of kefir has been associated with improved digestion and tolerance to lactose, antibacterial effect, hypocholesterolaemic effect, control of plasma glucose, anti-hypertensive effect, anti-inflammatory effect, antioxidant activity, anti-carcinogenic activity, anti-allergenic activity and healing effects. A large proportion of the studies that support these findings were conducted in vitro or in animal models. However, there is a need for systematic clinical trials to better understand the effects of regular use of kefir as part of a diet, and for their effect on preventing diseases. Thus, the present review focuses on the nutritional and microbiological composition of kefir and presents relevant findings associated with the beneficial effects of kefir on human and animal health.

Intolerancia a la lactosa / Lactose intolerance

La intolerancia a la lactosa (IL) es el síndrome de malabsorción más frecuente en la infancia y adolescencia. Se manifiesta con dolor, molestias abdominales, diarrea, flatulencia, distensión abdominal, náuseas e incluso vómitos. La lactosa es un disacárido presente en la leche que se hidroliza gracias a la acción de la lactasa-floricina-hidrolasa (LPH). Así, la IL se produce cuando, por diferentes circunstancias (transitorias como las infecciones o genéticas), la LPH disminuye/pierde su función induciendo una carencia en la digestión de la lactosa. Puesto que en esta situación se produce (en muchos casos) una retirada de lácteos, debe controlarse especialmente la ingestión de calcio y, por la particular dependencia de este, la densidad mineral ósea (DMO). La DMO es un factor relevante para prevenir la osteoporosis y, dado que una buena masa ósea en la etapa adulta dependerá del acopio efectuado durante la infancia, se debe prestar especial atención a los aspectos nutricionales. Para ello, existen diferentes opciones dietéticas como leche sin lactosa o de baja concentración además de bebidas vegetales o alimentos ricos en calcio; sin embargo, estas dos últimas opciones son inadecuadas nutricionalmente como sustitutivas de la leche (AU)

Lactose intolerance (LI) is the most common malabsorption syndrome in childhood and adolescence. It manifests itself as pain, abdominal trouble, diarrhoea, flatulence, abdominal distension, nausea and even vomiting. Lactose is a disaccharide present in milk which is hydrolysed through the action of lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (LPH). Thus, LI occurs when, for different reasons (transitory infections or genetic), the LPH diminishes/loses its function, inducing a deficiency in lactose digestion. As in this situation dairy products are often withdrawn, special care must be taken to monitor calcium intake and, due to its particular dependence on this, bone mineral density (BMD). BMD is an important factor in preventing osteoporosis and, as good bone mass in adulthood will depend on that built up in childhood, special attention must be paid to nutritional aspects. There are different dietary options for this purpose, such as lactose-free milk or milk with a low lactose content, as well as plant-based drinks or calcium-rich foods; however, the latter two options are nutritionally inadequate as milk substitutes (AU)

Manejo de la intolerancia a la lactosa entre los médicos de atención primaria y su correlación con la de los especialistas en digestivo: encuesta nacional SEPD-SEMG / The management of lactose intolerance among primary care physicians and its correlation with management by gastroenterologists: The SEPD-SEMG national survey

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: el conocimiento sobre la intolerancia a la lactosa (IL) es limitado en algunos ámbitos profesionales. La Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) y la Sociedad Española de Medicina General (SEMG) han elaborado una encuesta con los objetivos de: a) analizar el nivel de conocimiento y de manejo clínico de los médicos de atención primaria (MAP); y b) comparar sus resultados con los de la encuesta ya realizada entre los gastroenterólogos españoles (GE). MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se envió un cuestionario online a los socios de la SEMG, con 27 preguntas sobre distintas cuestiones: demografía y características laborales, actitud frente a la IL, métodos de diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento. Los resultados fueron comparados con los de la encuesta a GE. RESULTADOS: se recopilaron 456 respuestas de MAP, que se compararon con las proporcionadas por 477 GE. Los MAP presentaron una edad media y experiencia profesional mayor. El nivel de conocimiento sobre IL fue parecido, si bien una mayor proporción de MAP desconocía la epidemiología del problema (p < 0,01). Los GE tendieron a considerar a la IL una patología "menor" (71,3 vs. 40,1%; p > 0,001), y a sus síntomas superponibles a los del síndrome del intestino irritable (93,5 vs. 88,2%; p = 0,005), si bien los síntomas reconocidos como sospechosos de IL fueron similares entre ambos grupos. Las recomendaciones dietéticas fueron reconocidas como la principal medida terapéutica. CONCLUSIÓN: este estudio permite conocer la actuación de los MAP ante la IL y compararla con la de los GE, como base para el desarrollo estrategias para mejorar el conocimiento, actitud y tratamiento de la IL en nuestro medio

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS:The understanding of lactose intolerance (LI) is limited in some professional settings. Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) and Sociedad Española de Medicina General (SEMG) have developed a survey in order to: a) Analyze primary care physicians (PCPs) knowledge and clinical management; and b) to compare results with those of a previous survey of Spanish gastroenterologists (GEs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was sent to SEMG members with 27 items on various issues: Demographics, occupational characteristics, outlook on LI, diagnostic tests, treatment, and follow-up. Results were compared to those from a survey of GEs. RESULTS: A total of 456 PCPs responded, versus 477 GEs. PCPs had an older mean age and longer professional experience. Level of understanding of LI was similar, albeit a higher proportion of PCPs lacked epidemiological awareness (p < 0.01). GEs tended to consider LI a "minor" condition (71.3 vs. 40.1%; p > 0.001), and LI symptoms as overlapping those of irritable bowel syndrome (93.5 vs. 88.2%; p = 0.005), although symptoms perceived as suspicious of LI were similar in both groups. Dietary recommendations were recognized as the primary therapeutic approach. CONCLUSION: This study reveals the outlook of PCPs on LI, and allows comparison with that of GEs, as a basis for the development of strategies aimed at improving LI understanding, approach and management in our setting

Lactose digestion from yogurt: mechanism and relevance.

Yogurt is traditionally consumed throughout the world among populations who are seemingly unable to digest lactose. This review provides a historical overview of the studies that show lactose digestion and tolerance from yogurt by lactose-intolerant people. The lactose in yogurt is digested more efficiently than other dairy sources of lactose because the bacteria inherent in yogurt assist with its digestion. The bacterial lactase survives the acidic conditions of the stomach, apparently being physically protected within the bacterial cells and facilitated by the buffering capacity of yogurt. The increasing pH as the yogurt enters the small intestine and a slower gastrointestinal transit time allow the bacterial lactase to be active, digesting lactose from yogurt sufficiently to prevent symptoms in lactose-intolerant people. There is little difference in the lactase capability of different commercial yogurts, because they apparently contain Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus in sufficient quantities (10(8) bacteria/mL). However, Lactobacillus acidophilus appears to require cell membrane disruption to physically release the lactase. Compared with unflavored yogurts, flavored yogurts appear to exhibit somewhat reduced lactase activity but are still well tolerated.

Yogurt, living cultures, and gut health.

Bacteria used to ferment milk to obtain yogurt belong to thermophilic, bile-sensitive species of lactic acid bacteria, which are not ideally suited for survival into the human gut. However, assessing the viability of these bacteria through the digestive tract may be relevant to evaluate their potential to deliver some beneficial effects for the well-being of the consumer. The well-known reduction in the symptoms caused by lactose maldigestion is not the only benefit provided by yogurt starter cultures; some additional effects will be reviewed here, with special attention paid to data that may suggest a strain-dependent effect, features that are not present with lactose hydrolysis.

[Surface proteins of bacteria of the genus Bifidobacterium]. / Bialka powierzchniowe bakterii z rodzaju Bifidobacterium.

Beneficial effects due to the presence of probiotic bacteria of the genus Bifidobacterium in the human intestinal tract are still an interesting object of study. So far activities have been confirmed of bifidobacteria in stimulation of the host immune system, stimulation of tumor cell apoptosis, improvement of bowel motility, alleviation of symptoms of lactose intolerance, cholesterol lowering capacity, prevention and treatment of diarrhea and irritable bowel syndrome, alleviation of allergy or atopic dermatitis, maintenance of homeostasis of the intestine, and stimulation of the development of normal intestinal microflora in infants. A multitude of therapeutic properties encourages researchers to investigate the possibility of using the potential of Bifidobacterium in the prevention and treatment of other conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and depression. Although it is known that the beneficial effects are due to intestinal mucosal colonization by these bacteria, the cell components responsible for the colonization are still not determined. In addition to the beneficial effects of probiotic administration, there were also negative effects including sepsis. Therefore research has been directed to identify specific components of Bifidobacterium responsible for probiotic effects. Currently researchers are focused on identifying, isolating and evaluating the properties of surface proteins that are probably involved in the adhesion of bacterial cells to the intestinal epithelium, improving colonization. This paper is an overview of current knowledge on Bifidobacterium surface proteins. The ways of transport and anchoring proteins in Gram-positive bacterial cells, the assembly of cell wall, and a description of the genus Bifidobacterium are presented.

Lactase treated feeds to promote growth and feeding tolerance in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Successful transition from parenteral nutrition to full enteral feedings during the immediate neonatal period is associated with improved growth in preterm infants. Lactase is the last of the major intestinal disaccharidases to develop in preterm infants. Because of inadequate lactase activity, preterm infants are unable to digest lactose. Lactase preparations could potentially be used to hydrolyse lactose in formulas and breast milk to minimize lactose malabsorption in preterm infants. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of the addition of lactase to milk compared to placebo or no intervention for the promotion of growth and feeding tolerance in preterm infants. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: weight gain expressed as grams/kg/day, growth expressed as weight, length and head circumference percentile for postmenstrual age (PMA), assessed at birth and at 40 weeks PMA, days to achieve full enteral feeds. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: several common outcomes associated with preterm birth, and adverse effects. SEARCH METHODS: Electronic and manual searches were conducted in January 2005 of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, 2004, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to Jan 2005), EMBASE (1980 to Jan 2005) and CINAHL (1982 to Jan 2005), personal files, bibliographies of identified trials and abstracts by the Pediatric Academic Societies' Meetings and the European Society of Pediatric Research Meetings published in Pediatric Research. The searches were repeated in May 2012 of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and abstracts from the Pediatric Academic Societies' Annual Meetings from 2000 to 2012 (Abstracts2View). The Web of Science was searched using the only previously identified trial by Erasmus 2002 as the starting point to search for additional trials that cited this trial. SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies: randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: preterm infants < 37 weeks PMA. INTERVENTION: addition of lactase to milk versus placebo or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were followed independently by the review authors to assess study quality and report outcomes. Treatment effects, calculated using Review Manager 5, included risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed-effect model was used for meta-analyses. We did not perform heterogeneity tests as only one study was identified. MAIN RESULTS: The repeat searches conducted in May 2012 did not identify any additional studies for inclusion. One study enrolling 130 infants of 26 to 34 weeks PMA (mean postnatal age at entry 11 days) was identified and no identified study was excluded. The study was a double blind randomized controlled trial of high quality. Lactase treated feeds were initiated when enteral feedings provided > 75% of daily intake. None of the primary outcomes outlined in the protocol for this review and only one of the secondary outcomes, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were reported on. The RR for NEC was 0.32 (95% CI 0.01 to 7.79); the RD was -0.02 (95% CI -0.06 to 0.03) (a reduction which was not statistically significant). There was a statistically significant increase in weight gain at study day 10 in the lactase treated feeds group but not at any other time points. Overall, there was not a statistically significant effect on weight gain. No adverse effects were noted. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The only randomized trial to date provides no evidence of significant benefit to preterm infants from adding lactase to their feeds. Further research regarding effectiveness and safety are required before practice recommendations can be made. Randomized controlled trials comparing lactase versus placebo treated feeds and enrolling infants when enteral feeds are introduced are required. The primary and secondary outcomes for effectiveness and safety should include those identified in this review.

Probiotics in the gastrointestinal diseases of the elderly.

Changes of the gut microflora in elderly appear to involve a reduction in numbers of healthy bacteria (lactobacilli and bifidobacteria) and an increase in numbers of potentially pathogenic species. These changes are generally described as gastrointestinal disorders and infections. This review analyses benefits of probiotics in old people, with particular interesting for the latest researches relevant to elderly people, e.g. trials examining enteric infections, antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea, functional bowel problems (constipation and irritable bowel syndrome), inflammatory bowel diseases, stimulation of the immune system and prevention of cancer. A growing number of researches indicates that some probiotic strains may help to maintain the health in old people, suggesting both health and cost-saving benefits in offering fermented dairy products. These benefits include: establishment of balanced intestinal microflora; improving colonization resistance and or prevention of diarrhea; reduction of fecal enzymes; reduction of serum cholesterol; reduction of potential mutagenes; reduction of lactose intolerance; synthesis of vitamins; predigestion of proteins.

Probiotics as an alternative strategy for prevention and treatment of human diseases: a review.

Probiotics are live microbial food supplements or their components, which have been shown to have beneficial effects on human health. Probiotics can be bacteria, molds, or yeasts, but most of them fall into the group known as lactic acid bacteria and are normally consumed in the form of yogurt, fermented milk, or other fermented foods. Data from clinical trials have shown contrasting effects and should be interpreted with caution. A large variety of potential beneficial effects have been reported including improvement of intestinal tract health, enhancing the immune system, reducing symptoms of lactose intolerance, decreasing the prevalence of allergy in susceptible individuals, reducing risk of certain cancers, treating colitis, lowering serum cholesterol concentrations, reducing blood pressure in hypertensives, and improving female urogenital infections and Helicobacter pylori infections. The aim of this article is to present a review of the current expanding knowledge of applications of utilizing probiotic microorganisms in the prevention and treatment of several diseases.

Beneficios de la soja en la edad pediátrica / Benefits of soy in infancy and childhood

Las fórmulas infantiles de soja cumplen las recomendaciones nutricionales de la Sociedad Europea de Gastroenterología, Hepatología y Nutrición Pediátrica (ESPGHAN) y de la Academia Americana de Pediatría (AAP) para las fórmulas de inicio y continuación, así como las de otros órganos consultivos. Todas las fórmulas de soja están fortificadas con yodo, hierro, metionina, carnitina y taurina, y para contrarrestar su contenido en fitatos suelen llevar un 20% más de calcio y fósforo que los fórmulas a base de leche de vaca. Sus indicaciones médicas actuales se limitan al tratamiento de la galactosemia, la alergia a proteínas de leche de vaca sin sensibilización a la proteína de soja, además de aquellas situaciones en que por razones filosóficas o religiosas deban incluirse como parte de dietas vegetarianas. Tanto el Comité de Nutrición de la ESPGHAN y como el de la AAP y la European Society for Paediatric Allergology and Clinical Immunology desaconsejan su uso en niños menores de 6 meses. El Comité Asesor de Guías Dietéticas 2010 recuerda la importancia del consumo de proteínas de alta calidad en niños y recomienda basar la dieta en fuentes proteicas vegetales para reducir el riesgo de enfermedades crónicas y lograr un buen estado nutricional. La proteína de la soja puede considerarse única en la calidad de su composición dentro de las de origen vegetal, con una amplia disponibilidad y capacidad de producción. La soja constituye una fuente de proteínas de alto valor biológico libre de grasas saturadas (AU)

Soy formulas meet the nutritional recommendations of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), as well as other advisory bodies, for newborn and infant formulas. All soy formulas are fortified with iodine, iron, methionine, carnitine and taurine, and to counter act their phytate content typically carry 20% more calcium and phosphorus than formulas based on cow’s milk. Current medical indications for soy formulas are limited to treatment of galactosemia cow’s milk protein allergy without sensitization to soy protein, in addition to those situations where is included as part of vegetarian diets due to philosophical or religious reasons. The ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition, the AAP and the European Society for Paediatric Allergology and Clinical Immunology advise against its use in children younger than 6 months. The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee 2010 recalls the importance of the consumption of high quality protein in children and recommended diet based on vegetable protein sources to reduce the risk of chronic disease and achieve good nutritional status. The soy protein can be considered as unique in its composition within the plant, with the widespread availability and capacity. Soy is a source of high biological value proteins free of saturated fats (AU)

Milk consumption and lactose intolerance in adults.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate relations between milk consumption and lactose intolerance (LI) in adults and to explore the effect of milk consumption on lactase activity. METHODS: Total of 182 subjects aged 20-70 years were recruited and interviewed by questionnaires, and their accumulative cow's milk intake (AMI) was calculated. LI was evaluated by hydrogen breath test (HBT). RESULTS: A negative correlation was found between AMI and severity of observed LI symptom (r=-0.2884; P<0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed a negative correlation between LI and duration and frequency of milk consumption (OR, 0.317 and 0.465, respectively; both P<0.05) and a positive correlation between LI and amount of milk consumed per sitting (OR, 6.337; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: LI is related to various milk consumption behaviors. Most Chinese adults with LI may tolerate moderate milk consumption <160 mL.

Situación actual de la intolerancia a la lactosa en la infancia / Current status of lactose intolerance in children

La lactosa es un disacárido de amplia distribución en la dieta y los productos farmacéuticos; es el azúcar de la leche de los mamíferos. Es frecuente una pérdida de la actividad lactásica intestinal con la edad, variable entre etnias y condicionada genéticamente, que puede causar su malabsorción. También puede ser secundaria a un daño mucoso intestinal y, en raras ocasiones, por déficit congénito. Malabsorción no implica necesariamente una intolerancia con significación clínica. La exclusión de la lactosa de la dieta produce mejoría clínica pero, a largo plazo, puede conllevar un defecto en la ingesta diaria recomendada de otros nutrientes como el calcio. Puede ser reintroducida en la dieta, si bien el umbral clínico de tolerancia es individual (AU)

Lactose is a widely distributed disaccharide in the diet and pharmaceutical industries. It is the sugar from the milk of mammals. The loss of intestinal lactase activity with age is frequent. It varies between ethnic and genetic conditions, and may cause its malabsorption. It may also be secondary to intestinal mucosal damage and, rarely, to congenital deficiency. Malabsorption does not necessarily imply clinical intolerance, with gastrointestinal symptoms after its ingestion. The exclusion of lactose from the diet produces clinical improvement but it could lead to a defect in the recommended daily intake of other nutrients such as calcium. It can be reintroduced into the diet but there is an individual clinical threshold of tolerance (AU)

Lactose intolerance: an unnecessary risk for low bone density.

The potential for lactose intolerance causes 25-50 million Americans and an unknown number of people around the world to avoid milk. Milk avoidance is a significant risk factor for low bone density. Individuals who avoid milk, due to intolerance or learned aversion, consume significantly less calcium and have poorer bone health and probable higher risk of osteoporosis. Lactose intolerance is easily managed by: (1) regular consumption of milk that adapts the colon bacteria and facilitates digestion of lactose; (2) consumption of yogurts and cheeses and other dairy foods low in lactose; consumption of dairy foods with meals to slow transit and maximize digestion, and use of lactose-digestive aids. As dairying spreads around the world to new markets and dairy foods become the dominant source of calcium in these markets, the potential for lactose intolerance will grow. Management of lactose intolerance globally will require both education and product development.